Dear friend,
I know that you’re in a hurry to test out Traffic Jeet and take your YouTube marketing business to the next level . . .
But before you do…
I’d like to give you the opportunity to gain a serious advantage over your competitors.
“Market Jeet” will let you jump right into any niche on YouTube and...
Well, you can do all of this with Market Jeet.
What I really want you to think about is the huge advantage that being able to contact all these people will bring to your business…
And you don’t have to worry about your messages being caught in the Gmail promotions tab either because your messages are all sent from within YouTube itself.
If you want to get more views and sales without waiting for your video to rank, Market Jeet can give you a massive leg-up on your competition.
Here…let me show you an example…
Let's say you've created this amazing exercise plan, got everything ready, and now all you need is some quality traffic to your offer…
Just feed in a keyword for the product you created or you’re promoting into MarketJeet to pull up loads of targeted leads.
Wanna see how it works? Let's go with a sample keyword. Let's pick 'ab workouts' and see what appears…
But That’s Not All !
Market Jeet Emulates ‘Human Behaviour’ To Keep Your Campaigns 100% Squeaky Clean
Market Jeet is a simple, yet ingenious piece of software that exploits YouTube features in two key ways – harvesting users, and then interacting with them.
Give Market Jeet a keyword, and it will scan all of YouTube for it.
Then it will quickly build a list of thousands of users who've uploaded a video in your niche.
After you do that, you find a few of the biggest and most popular videos in your niche. In fact, you specifically want to find the ones that have been commented on the most.
Copy those urls into Market Jeet, and the software will automatically harvest another list of every single YouTube user that’s commented on those videos.
Next, you use Market Jeet to search for videos related to your keyword, harvest that list, and then use that to harvest YET ANOTHER list of users that commented on THOSE videos.
Think about that for a second – add those three lists up, and that can potentially be THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS of people.
Now…THIS is where the Magic happens…
Once you have this huge combined list of users – which includes not only all the “movers and shakers” in your niche, but many of the most targeted and hungry prospects – you can use Market Jeet to contact and directly interact with them.
First you send them a contact request, and after they accept, you can SHARE YOUR BRAND NEW VIDEO WITH EACH AND EVERY USER ON THE LIST MARKET JEET CREATED FOR YOU.
Think about it – know how you can get a ton of traffic when someone with an email list of thousands of people sends out your link to their subscribers? Or when someone Tweets out your video to their thousands of followers?
You could potentially get the exact SAME sort of results by using Market Jeet to harvest and contact a massive list of YouTube users.
Let that sink in for just a minute…and realize just how much potential that has.
If you haven’t yet done it…
Watch the Demo Video at the top of this page
and BE AMAZED !
Market Jeet gives you DIRECT ACCESS to your customers, and puts your videos directly in front of them…
…all for a seriously low investment…
You'll never be angry or upset at Google and YouTube about traffic again.
You know what's the best thing? The few alternatives to Market Jeet that do the same thing as this, cost anywhere between 3x to 5x this much. You're saving your money on this investment every inch of the way!!
However, you NEED to take action now, this offer is on a really FAST DIMESALE (price increases with every sale) and more than that, we won’t be keeping it in the market for long as this is a SPECIAL OFFER for only Traffic Jeet Customers!
We’re NOT going to charge you $197+, heck… we won’t even charge you $97 !
Just For Today as a Traffic Jeet Customer, we’re going to Give You a LIFETIME LICENSE to Market Jeet with a Massive Discount and you pay only $37 !

Download: http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/DP1ZZUFV/MarketJeet_Pro_-_Copy.rar_links

Few readers of this weblog can have read the unfolding drama of recent events in the East of Ukraine and in the Crimea without a sense of deep concern and foreboding.  News and commentary on the political and military dimensions of these events are extensively covered elsewhere, on both the traditional and the social media. There is also an intellectual property aspect to the annexation of any territory by a foreign power, and it is that which weblog is best able to convey to its readers.

In this context the following information, lightly edited, has been circulated by the IPKat's friends in the leading Ukraine law practice of Arzinger:

"IP IN THE LIGHT OF THE UKRAINE/RUSSIA CONFRONTATION 

...  On 5 May 2014 the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) stated the following: IPR objects that are protected in Ukraine will obtain protection in Russia only where the rightholders of those IPR objects file an application to the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) on recognition of the exclusive IPR to the IPR object within the Russian Federation. The essential conditions thereof are the following: 

• an applicant shall be a resident of Crimea or have a permanent location there;
• a certificate of IPR to the trademark or a patent must be valid as of 18 March 2014 and a duly translated version of such protection document shall be attached to the application. 

Taking into consideration the fact that trademarks are high-usage IPR objects elsewhere, we would like to present the outlook for the consequences of such an initiative for “Crimean trademarks”. 

...  the category of widely known trademarks such as “Inkerman”, “Novyy Svet”, “Magarach”, “Massandra”, “Koktebel” of wine makers or “Oreanda”, “Intourist Yalta” in the sphere of hotel business, are under protection in the Russian Federation. Besides, lots of local cafes, supermarket chains, hotels and even petrol stations are used to operate exclusively within the territory of Crimea without any designs to work up the Russian market. Thus, there has not been any need to obtain relevant protection in the Russian Federation. However, now the rightholders of such trademarks must file an application for recognition of the exclusive IPR to the IPR object within the Russian Federation. 

Despite this, there will be a lot of pitfalls even in the case of re-registration. The most prominent one is a “clash of trademarks”. The risks are rather high that the “Crimean trademark” will be considered as identical or similar to those trademarks which are also protected in the Russian Federation and consequently challenged before the court of the Russian Federation. Here are possible variants of obtaining trademarks protection in such cases: 

• to establish the right of prior use in the courts of Russia;
• to conclude license agreements with right holder. For implementation of the present solution the government of the Russian Federation may set forth preferential terms of obtaining such license which, for instance, could be valid only on the territory of Crimea. 

In addition, those Crimeans who desire to obtain protection in the Russian Federation for a new trademark should bear in mind that in the Russian Federation a trademark can be registered only in the name of natural person-entrepreneurs and legal entities. We cannot consider this matter to be good or ill. Anyway, we assume that trademarks with a natural persons as an applicant will be invalid in Crimea as well as in Russia. 

On April 15, 2014 the Parliament of Ukraine adopted a law “On legal guarantees of people’s rights and freedoms on the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine”. Pursuant to the provisions of the Law the temporarily occupied territory is an integral part of the territory of Ukraine and subject to the Constitution of Ukraine as well as Ukrainian legislation. 

Nevertheless, we should take into consideration the current situation and be guided exclusively by a need to protect the IPR. Nowadays the trademark protection obtained in Ukraine is not enough for trademark protection in Crimea in practice. Thus, the rightholders from the continent part of Ukraine who intend to continue running business in Crimea are walking on a razor's edge, because at any time Russian rightholders may prohibit the use of confusingly similar trademarks of Ukrainian rightholders in Crimea if the trademark is not protected in Russia. Therefore, the relevant solution is to apply for protection in Russia either through national or international procedure of trademark registration. 

Taking into account the abovementioned we may conclude that now the rightholders from Crimea shall be doubly attentive to protection of their IPR. Otherwise, the consequences can cost them a lot of time, money as well as the other resources for IPR enforcement and protection".

The IPKat thanks Arzinger for this information. Readers who require more than this are advised to approach Arzinger or any other appropriately IP-sensitive legal practice in Ukraine for further guidance.  This Kat has not yet received any information, corroborative or otherwise, from any IP practice in the Russian Federation.

Merpel adds that, where politics, conflicting nationalisms and military conflict cause waves of uncertainty, even something as ostensibly trivial as the stability of brand names can provide a degree of comfort and security for those poor souls who did not cause the troubles, who have no personal means of resolving them and who are often most adversely affected by them.

Download: http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/YA69SPF4/CraigslistDominator.rar_links

It is against this backdrop that this Kat read with interest an article that appeared in the May 3, 2014 issue of The Economist, entitled “NewTube: Online Video and Advertising”, here. The article considered the various types of companies that are seeking to enter the competition for viewers of online content. The question that arises is whether, in a world where television still seems to be king, many of these would-be purveyors of online content will be sorely disappointed at the degree of success of their venture, unless the share of online eyeballs dramatically increases in comparison with television viewers. In considering the proliferation of new sources for online video content, one need go no further that what is transpiring at the venerable New York Times. There, under the leadership of Mark Thompson ( former director-general of the BBC), the newspaper is launching 14 online “channels”, which will include short shows based on columns appearing in the newspaper. Going even further, the plans are to have at least one “channel” where comedians will apparently mock court proceedings. Further, the website itself will enable advertisers to show videos on their behalf.

How far, it is hoped at online viewing of content will ape television content can be seen in the presentations made several weeks ago by assorted companies at the so-called “NewFronts” event. Traditionally, television networks take part in what is called the “Upfront”, here, where they seek to market their new programs to potential advertisers. “NewsFront” hopes to become the internet version of “Upfront”. More than twelve companies made presentations of their online content to prospective advertisers, including such diverse companies as AOL, Condé Nast (best known for its upscale collection of magazines, here) and Google. But this proliferation of content purveyors is not limited to those seeking to chase ad revenues. Other companies are seeking to monetize the online viewing of content for different commercial purposes. Microsoft is making videos for distribution on its Xbox console, with the goal of increasing sales of the console, thereby seeking to create a form of ecosystem that is vaguely redolent of the iPhone ecosystem. Netflix is using contents to increase its viewer subscription base, building on the enormous success of its “House of Cards” series, here.

All of this sounds quite exciting, but this Kat is brought back to the data point with which he began—at least in the US, people view 4.50 hours of television content and only around 1.00 hour of online content. For at least some of these new online content ventures to succeed, either television viewing finally begins to decline materially, to the advantage of online platforms, or video content viewers will increase their daily intake to more than the current 5.50 hours, whereby the viewing pie for video contents increases, to the advantage of both television and online purveyors. Alternatively, if neither of these scenarios comes to pass, perhaps some of these platforms will develop a niche following of devoted viewers. The New York Times seems to have succeeded to an extent in leveraging its brand to attract a material number of paywall customers for its newspaper content; perhaps it can further extend its brand into commercially viable online content. Or perhaps none of these will come to pass. Instead, in the concluding words of The Economist—

It is one thing to turn out wacky, original ideas, but another to produce programmes people really want to watch. ‘House of Cards’ is one of the few online series that people around the world have heard of, and its title hints at what can go wrong when firms pile into new internet trends.