What should be done about orphan works?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcd8d/bcd8d8774a53708e0868d8b8f9d5db5866380e36" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46042/46042bf491c91efa79b0ad4dd83f8f58dff1d6ea" alt=""
Left: typical response from a publisher on discovering that a genuinely verifiable copyright owner has just turned up on her doorstep and that he is looking for real satisfaction
Least popular of the options was that of setting up a state fund into which users of orphan works could make payments that would be put towards expenditure for the benefit of authors. Perhaps on account of its lack of support, its paternalistic attitude towards the arts and its conviction that this solution would cost it nothing, this is the approach that will be favoured by many governments.
The IPKat senses that this is not an issue upon which the IP world is about to tear itself apart. Merpel adds that, while patents are allowed to lapse and trade marks can be revoked for non-use, there's no apparent means of terminating an unregistered copyright once it comes into existence -- which means that the long-invisible copyright owner can always put in an unscheduled reappearance and give an unauthorised user a real surprise.