Examining US patent examinations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8140/a8140ac97a8e2621600ecf5efe47fb5693ba5dcd" alt=""
For the paper, he and co-author Bhaven Sampat of Columbia followed every patent application filed in January 2001 and published by April 2006 – a total of 9,960 applications. Using the USPTO’s PAIR database, they were able to collect a vast amount of data on the applications.
Unsurprisingly, the large majority of examinations – 86% - started with a non final objection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc04f/fc04f4ae61918a2e604cdb0b9beff3cab15c9ef7" alt=""
85% of the patents that do issue, issue with amended claims. 66.1 percent of applications which were amended after a final rejection are patented, versus 29.0 percent of those that were not amended. A cynical cat would note that this is something every patent attorney could have told you: you can always get a patent, the question is, what for? But, as Prof. Lemley notes, the fact that most patents are granted with amended claims shows that the USPTO is serving its role as a gatekeeper potentially better than its critics acknowledge: it is not enough to point out that 70% of applications result in granted patents to conclude that it is “too easy” to get a patent if 85% of the patents are granted with amended – presumably limited – claims.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f67c/2f67cdb5bf479b10abbafd420cdc56335d1361db" alt=""
27% of the applications have continuations or a RCE (Request for Continued Examination). The number of continuations varies greatly between industries (see table above). Again, the result pretty much confirms the conventional wisdom – biotech applications are well known for continuations.
Working draft of the paper here.