Monday miscellany
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24c37/24c37c6e2d37155b8030c3dbd6559145051c7a60" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ee4f/2ee4f29947f18b1bab182fa21e2154110193efe5" alt=""
The AIPPI UK held a fascinating meeting last week, hosted in the London office of Linklaters, on the topic "Employee compensation in the UK and Germany: a microcosm of pragmatism and efficiency". The speakers were Klaus Haft (Reimann Osterrieth Köhler Haft) and Michael Edenborough (Searle Court). The IPKat's friend Justin Watts (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) has kindly procured a most useful note of the substance of the meeting, which you can now read here.
For those who not only take their IP seriously but like a more serious presentation than that furnished by a team of fictional Kats, it's worth taking a trip to this blog which is run by Canadian academic Jeremy de Beer. The author, an Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa's Faculty of Law, focuses on the areas of technology and intellectual property law. He also tweets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a6ca/5a6ca31c8c3c117bee84a0de85f2d91705238df6" alt=""
Right: the mysteries of Google: this is one of the more unexpected results of a search on Google Image using the words 'partial judge' as the search term
The Board concluded that "Once lawfully appointed, a judge is deemed to act in good faith and is therefore presumed impartial until proven otherwise" (para 2.5), having affirmed that
The IPKat's ever-enthusiastic friend and patent buddy Joe Scott has been telling him all about the new tool he has released to help Patent Buddy members make the most of their IPR network. He writes:
"2.4 According to established case law of the Boards of Appeal, of the Enlarged Board and also of national courts of member states, the mere fact that a board member has expressed a view on the legal issue to be decided on a previous occasion, be it in a prior decision or in literature, be it in a prior position in the EPO or as an expert for external political institutions, cannot lead to the conclusion of doubts as to impartiality. Nor does a purely subjective impression that the opinions of a board member might be disadvantageous to a particular interest justify an exclusion".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6de8f/6de8fcb7c2a07223f86226df6b60fdeb32442d5d" alt=""
"Anyone registered with any patent authority in the world can join at no charge and open a Biz Dev Dashboard. When they select the Who Knows Who tab they can enter the [Name] of a USPTO-registered attorney or agent to see two levels of their network: Co-Workers and People Who They May Know. From a business development standpoint, this is really handy when you are looking for an introduction to a counsel at a particular law firm, company or university. Selecting the Co-workers link will display a list of who is currently working with [Name]. Selecting the People [Name] May Know link returns a drop down menu showing, by Co-worker, all of the attorneys & agents that they, in turn might know".He adds:
"I entered the name of my patent attorney and was shown a list of his 77 co-workers. Selecting his first co-worker's name returned a list of 76 other contacts from ten law firms and 12 companies. I would guess that his second-level network would total 500+ connections".It occurs to the IPKat that this tool has at least one handy use: you can find out if a USPTO-registered patent attorney is working for one of your competitors and save both him and you the time and effort of initiating a possible client relationship that's never going to happen.