Under 30 at Out North
We made it on time to Out North last night for Under 30. (Under 30 refers to the time (minutes) of the performance, not the age of the performers. It seems they now spell it Under :30 which I thought was a typo, but now see it's trying to clarify the meaning.) Last week we got to Santaland Diaries a few minutes late and it had already begun and was full, so we weren't allowed in, although we had purchased tickets in advance online. We were able to transfer our payment to this show. So we got there early enough this time to check ou the retrospective exhibit of the Under 30: Sweet Sixteen Archive Exhibit.
The exhibit has a wall length time line of the Under 30 programs from the beginning. And then there were these various props from different shows over the years. We've been to a fair number of them and they are always interesting, and usually there's at least one performer we know.
Many of the performances over the years have been done by people who don't normally do theatrical work. It seems like as good a way as possible to work on and present something important to the world. A lot of the work is still in the development stage. This is the first public showing and gets important feedback for the next stage, if the person wants to go further with it. Some manage to work well even at this stage.
There's a more complete proposal description on their website.
The performances were introduced by Scott Turner Schofield who is a visiting performer who will be putting on Debutante Balls Jan. 14 -17. He seemed totally comfortable onstage and I'm sorry we're going to miss his show, but we leave for Juneau on the 11th.
Given that taking pictures in the middle of the show is often forbidden I'm filling in with these pictures from the exhibit.
All four performances last night kept my attention, though for me the third one - Jonathan Lang's "Radio" - worked most fully. It was a retrospective of radio in Alaska, starting from when Jonathan's family arrived in Alaska through his days on radio in Anchorage. The juxtaposition of taped 'radio' in the background, some props on stage, and probably the relatively uncomplicated content, made it the most complete and unified piece for me.
Van Le's "Letters to Ho Chi Minh" represented, perhaps, the most ambitious work, as she tried to articulate her family's experiences as refugees who survived smugglers, pirates, refugee camp in Malaysia on the way to the United States and the cross generational conflicts of children who want to know what happened and parents who want to forget. Some of the obstacles she still has to work out in the piece are technical ones - jumping back and forth between different time periods. Others are probably more emotional - I think more reenactment rather than telling of the stories would be more powerful. I got to meet Van Le when she was volunteering for the Anchorage International Film Festival and so it was particularly fun to be able to see how she put this together. The photo was taken after her performance, but before they moved things off the stage for the next performance.
Don Decker's piece integrated video into the performance. I liked a lot of the parts - particularly the extreme closeups of the lines in the videos. And he had some audience members laughing almost non-stop. I just didn't follow how all the pieces came together as one coherent statement. But maybe that wasn't intended.
Mark Muro's monologue started shakey, then got into gear, and then seemed to veer into different directions. Mark's done the Under 30 thing four times before according to the program and he could talk off the top of his head and it could be interesting and provocative. And I've heard him do that more effectively than his piece last night - but then last night he had to carry it off for thirty minutes. But Mark took the challenge and stood up and did his thing.
That's one reason people should go to the performance this afternoon at 3 or next weekend. The challenge is out there for next year's Under 30. This is something anyone could actually do. The only thing different from those on stage and you and me is that they put in their proposals. So, being in the audience is also a personal challenge. What do you have to say and how could you say it so it would keep an audience's attention for 30 minutes?