Something to read -- and indeed to sample
Always fascinated by lawbooks for laymen, the IPKat notes the recent publication of Patent Law for Computer Scientists: Steps to Protect Computer-Implemented Inventions, by Daniel Closa, Alex Gardiner, Falk Giemsa and Jörg Machek.
Who are the authors? Daniel Closa studied in France and worked for Thomson before joining the European Patent Office (EPO) as an examiner in Berlin. Transferring to Munich, he gained experience in the electronics field and specialised in opposition procedures. Alex Gardiner, an engineering from Aberdeen University, is also an EPO man, though he moved from Munich to Hague, where he worked with business method applications. Safely back in Munich again, he has trained examiners. Falk Giemsa studied computer science in Munich, then signed up for the EPO as an examiner; he too works in the field of business methods, as well as educational and demonstration appliances. Jörg Machek, a physicist, is educated in Austria and England. Having worked in manufacturing and semiconductor devices research, he too joined the EPO where he is now a director in charge of searching and examining computer-implemented inventions and methods for doing business. All write in their private capacities. However, while the addition of four zeros only ever totals zero, the addition of four EPO computer software experts may come out to a higher figure ...
This team has explained to the IPKat that it has sought to addresses the difficulty of writing patent applications in the field of computer implemented inventions -- not to mention the difficult and controversial question whether an invention in that field can be protected by a patent at all. The book contains, instead of the boring old case law, "a synopsis of current filing practices, requirements and philosophies across the major patent offices", focusing principally on business methods, gaming, computer simulation and graphics user interfaces. The goal is to let inventors, "normally in association with their patent attorney", decide if and where the filing of a patent application may enjoy reasonable chances of grant of a patent.
This book will receive in due course a proper review on this weblog. Meanwhile, if you can't bear to be without it, you can get details of it from the Springer website here.
This book will receive in due course a proper review on this weblog. Meanwhile, if you can't bear to be without it, you can get details of it from the Springer website here.
If you fancy sampling it, you can read the Contents here, the Preface here and a 16 page sample relating to Business Methods here.