IP and Retail Conference: Part II
An 100 year lead over etailers wasn't enough to save Woolworths once the internet arrived |
Next on Robert's list was an analysis of search engine optimisation (SEO), and the ways and means of both boosting websites' ratings on internet search results and the ways of detecting them (this blogger was not previously familiar with the term "black hat" SEO, though he is quite familiar with the bag of tricks to which that term refers). Since SEO never pushes search results higher than listed advertisements, is it worth it anyway? Yes, if the relevant consumers are "ad blind" and automatically discount the top search results as being advertisements, since the best organic search results will be the first thing they see.
Robert then discussed the purchase of keywords, the relationship of the EU's Trade Mark Directive and its harmonisation provisions to the E-Commerce Directive and the bevy of Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law on their use and, in particular, on whether the internet-using consumer, being reasonably well-informed and reasonably observant, would clearly realise that the result of an internet search related to the brand which they had used as a search term. A helpful review of the national and CJEU versions of the Interflora litigation (see here on the IPKat) and negative keywords was then delivered.