AIPPI Congress Report 1: A new era of IP collaboration and harmonization
 |
| The AmeriKat's view of Toronto at this year's AIPPI Congress |
Last night's Opening Ceremony was a culmination of a day which saw the AmeriKat bursting into huge smiles when seeing old friends and meeting new ones, contributing to the tailoring of the new working questions for next year's Congress in Rio (the four questions are on trade secrets, copyright exceptions for libraries and academic use, inventorship and free-riding in respect of trade marks) and clinking glasses with her colleagues on the new Special Committee on the Unified Patent Court.
The Opening Ceremony held at the cavernous Roy Thomson Hall saw a panel of speakers welcoming the attendees in between bursts of energetic arrangements of famous Canadian music from the 60s to now. The outgoing President of AIPPI, John Bochnovic (Smart & Biggar) gave an emotional speech about the work AIPPI has done to increase the involvement of its members and efficiency of the organization, and most importantly, its global reach. More needed to be done to reach potential members in Africa, Bochnovic stated, as well as maintaining the constant collaboration with members outside of annual events like the Congress. He also welcomed the new regime whereby Congresses would be held annually instead of every two years, as a step in ensuring constant collaboration. Next stop, Rio de Janeiro in 2015.
The key note speech was given by the quietly eloquent (and funny) Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada. Justice Rothstien continued the theme of collaboration and harmonization with that of the coordination of the law between domestic courts. He recommended that domestic courts should consider judgments of other foreign domestic courts as, in his experience, a well-reasoned decision of a foreign court on similar facts can provide good insight into the legal analysis and the possible consequences of such a decision. It can be beneficial, he continued, but not always appropriate.
In support of his argument Justice Rothstein cited two Canadian Supreme cases. The first was the 2008 decision in Apotex v Sanofi whereby the court was tasked to consider validity of selection patents and the test for anticipation and obviousness. There the Court found assistance from Lord Walker in the House of Lords decision in Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. This was an example of where Canadian law was reinforced and supported by foreign sources. In respect of the obviousness test, Justice Rothstein stated that at the time the Canadian test was considered out of step with the rest of the world, particularly the UK and US where a more flexible approach was being applied. Although the Canadian court was not bound to change the law they nevertheless considered it worth while to examine foreign sources such as Justice Kennedy's Opinion in KSR and Lord Hoffmann's dicta in Lundbeck. Again, these decisions helped strengthen the Canadian law on obviousness so that it could evolve into a more flexible test .
But foreign law does not always have immediate weight. In the Harvard Mouse case, the Canadian Supreme Court overturned Justice Rothstein's decision when he was an appellate judge which would have permitted patentability in the case. Such a decision would have been inline with caselaw in the US and Europe. He specifically applied the US Supreme Court's decision in Chakrabarty to find support for patentability for higher life forms. The Canadian Supreme Court overturned his decision in a 5:4 vote. Like Justice Rothstein, the dissent also found support for patentability in the laws of other countries. The position in other countries was not a reason per se for the Canadian court to permit patentability of higher life forms, but because:
"The mobility of capital and technology makes it desirable that comparable jurisdictions with comparable intellectual property legislation arrive at similar legal results."Justice Rothstein considered that the openness of comparative analysis can lead to gradual harmonization which is an "important and laudable goal for IP law".
In concluding his key note address, Justice Rothstein recalled the occasion when he was asked to decide a moot held at UCL between Sir Robin Jacob and Lord Hoffman (watch the moot here). At the time he turned to his wife and asked "Did you ever in your wildest dreams think I would be asked to decide a moot between these two world IP icons?" His wife turned to him and said "Marshall, you are not in my wildest dreams."
And with that, the 2015 AIPPI Congress is open. Expect more reports this week from the AmeriKat, Eibhlin and Lorraine on topics as diverse as second medical use and the ever-important issue of harmonization of privilege.
