BREAKING: Dutch court refers questions to CJEU on e-lending and digital exhaustion
Fancy a trip to Luxembourg? |
First of all, a kat-warning: this is not an April's Fool joke, also because how could you ever make copyright-related jokes? ;)
A few months ago this very blog reported that a new reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) could be on its way from copyright-loving Member States The Netherlands, regarding topical issues such as e-lending and ... digital exhaustion [yay! You can check out the latest Kat-installment in this apparently never-ending story here].
Although on holiday, invariably helpful and enthusiastic - yet anonymous - Katfriend who nonetheless tweets as 'Pacta Sunt Servanda' (@TreatyNotifier) has just alerted this Kat that the questions that the Court of First Instance of The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag) is sending to Luxembourg for some well-deserved CJEU treatment have now been finalised [and are available in Dutch here].
They are [translation provided by Pacta]:
1. Should Articles 1(1), 2(1b) and 6(1) of Directive 2006/115 [the Rental and Lending Rights Directive] be interpreted in such a way, that "Lending" should also encompass: making available to the public - through a publicly accessible institution for use without direct or indirect commercial or economic advantage- copyright-protected novels [Dutch: romans], short stories [verhalenbundels], bibliographies, travelogues, children's books and children's literature [jeugdliteratuur] [Pacta-NOTE: the judge did not expect a special treatment of these classes of ebooks, but it is those ebooks (and not a wider definition) that form part of the dispute, so the judge did not see a reason for having a more general question]
- through the placement of a copy in digital form (reproduction A) on the server of the institution (= library) and enabling that a copy can reproduce that copy on his own computer (reproduction B)
- where this copy (reproduction B) is not usable anymore after a limited time
- where other users can not download the copy (reproduction A) during that limited time
.... was not said in Allposters |
3. If the answer to Question 2 is in the affirmative is it relevant whether Reproduction A was obtained from a legal source?
4. If the answer to Question 2 is in the affirmative, is obtaining an ebook through a library download so that the rental is for an indefinite period, akin to a sale so that the right of distribution is exhausted? [so it would seem that the CJEU did not address this point uncontroversially in Allposters, here ...]