Bugtraq: [SECURITY] [DSA 3586-1] atheme-services security update

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA256

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-

Debian Security Advisory DSA-3586-1 security (at) debian (dot) org [email concealed]

http://ift.tt/1kZ5swi Moritz Muehlenhoff

May 23, 2016 http://ift.tt/1S3Txy1

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-

Package : atheme-services

CVE ID : CVE-2016-4478

It was discovered that a buffer overflow in the XMLRPC response encoding

code of the Atheme IRC services may result in denial of service.

For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in

version 6.0.11-2+deb8u1.

For the testing distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed

in version 7.0.7-2.

For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in

version 7.0.7-2.

We recommend that you upgrade your atheme-services packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply

these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be

found at: http://ift.tt/1kZ5swi

Mailing list: debian-security-announce (at) lists.debian (dot) org [email concealed]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXQ3CNAAoJEBDCk7bDfE42954P/3WLQz1DcmpFdEykinHBsqH4

swHZcjbuXZENhiKYIyBaidtnm5eXwe1JH/AVWJ5zKZ97dzQ3aLB1bsCN65dQQl+I

8ytWHlAR2xxvlwa+kqWBhfW8CS3VlhX8U5dxWLSCXT5ftsBsuDnepQCrNzwRvlUT

rw3Xb9S3chzI3bhBNab64LDp84vm669MdkS48JwyY3e/WPa19fRn6DbvlwP61jFW

jw6t5NfBNIpydDmCAZTEMmAnDhS6wZHPVkZlK8vYt4jApYjbT4L35/uX5kiF4phw

maoLVFNgMiXK1udnvRf7PXXgH4PDq56in34oa27qOk1fKT6i7d9ltl7bGl1xqnpA

8gqkomi3H+EMQvnV7aVh3BZ0BoGvi1tJ9fp0eWcgDUQ7aWSOYHtxFpC5MtNudUoP

u9BTMs224DV2de/vGlUpdQkizP0fPbiqWkV1u4Wgx7hBxG6C7Ru9/LngQqwatsNZ

cwHw7AZfduqZJ2adP20lMJlm+v5T3ekabd1Y590IpEgXBBaLIHSWn3WCMXna4F6/

FgL5TneSayjzeTcW7EEJfIG4WTQr+eIdvlm53WGOCSwlcPX5y8HsN0kQPGIqajqz

PcT5LttIObblJQYJ6BGxsWjGEUHg9E5zC8lDfocJEiYtscygVAeTy+VbDWrqcGg+

SmfH9IIRFEVIG1rGXmC9

=kK57

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ reply ]

from SecurityFocus Vulnerabilities http://ift.tt/1NIBL5z