While attending DFRWS 2008, I also attended the Forensic Rodeo. I say "attended" because I originally had no intention of participating, as I had wanted to watch what others did with the data and the process they used to approach their analysis. It was very interesting to watch the team at my table, and the forensic rodeo was actually somewhat realistic.

Want to give it a shot yourself? The files for the forensic rodeo have been posted here.

I'd be interested to hear your approach, and the tools you used.

I have to say...I'm not an avid conference goer/crasher, but I have been to a few security conferences, starting with Usenix back on '00, and including BlackHat, DefCon (presented at DefCon 9), GMU/RCFG, etc. That said, by far, DFRWS is the best conference I've ever attended! Based on content, program structure, and attendees, this was hands-down THE best conference I've ever attended! The only reservation I have in saying that is that the OMFW was a workshop, but I would like to see it somehow either expanded in its own right, or included in the DFRWS conference.

Location, Venue - The conference location was great, and in this case, easy to get to as it was relatively close to my location, and to the airport. The facilities were great, and there were plenty of places to eat locally...although the food provided at the conference was really pretty good. Interestingly enough, when Cory and I checked in on Sunday, Oticon (anime conference) was just finishing up, so there were all these kids dressed up as anime cartoon characters...which was actually pretty funny. Cory posited that DFRWS was the second nerdiest conference in town, and I think he was right! Perhaps this was sort of the unintended entertainment for the computer nerds...

Speakers - The speakers were excellent all around, and the technical committee deserves a round of applause for being able to select the papers that were presented from the range of of submissions. Of course, there were a couple of papers I was particularly interested in, such as Tim Morgan's paper on recovering deleted data from within Registry hive files. Also, the first keynote address by SA Ryan Moore, on network traffic analysis of compromised POS systems was interesting...to hear that the USSS is involved in PCI-type engagements and to what degree.

Networking - One of the best things about conferences like this is that it draws folks from within the community that you hear about or hear from online, but don't actually get to meet face-to-face...until the conference. For example, I don't live too far from Richard of TaoSecurity, but we never cross paths, and got to chat for a few minutes at the conference. The same is true for folks like Moyix, Andreas, AAron, Brian, Eoghan, Michael and many others. In some cases, I've been under the impression that some folks were like unicorns...there were emails and blogs with their names on them, but few would admit to sightings, particularly while sober...and yet, there they were! Another great benefit of the conference was for folks like Tim and JT to meet up...they'd each been working on the same thing (ie, deleted keys within Registry hive files) and neither knew that the other was working away! Having them collaborate can only be a good thing!

Forensics Rodeo - The Forensics Rodeo on Tues evening was a great time. I didn't participate, per se, although Cory did. I mostly wanted to watch and see how others go about their analysis when given materials/data, so I took notes and yelled out the instructions and questions to be answered across the table. In this case, each team was given a Windows memory dump and an image of a thumb drive, and a set of questions. Our team won...which is to say that Dr. Michael Cohen won, using Volatility and PyFlag, and the rest of us within the ECR (military acronym meaning the "effective casualty radius") won through proximity.

If I had one criticism about this event, it would be the fact that the Wharf Rat, the venue for the reception on Monday evening, as out of the one beer that I went there to try! The waitress said that the menu on the web site isn't kept up-to-date...for shame! How dare you play tricks on an old man!

The DFRWS 2008 CfP and Challenge have been posted!

The CfP invites contributions on a wide range of subjects, including:

• Incident response and live analysis
• File system and memory analysis
• Small scale and mobile devices
• Data hiding and recovery
• File extraction from data blocks (“file carving”)

And here's a couple that should be interesting:

• Anti-forensics and anti-anti-forensics
• Non-traditional approaches to forensic analysis

Submission deadline is 17 Mar, with author notification about 6 wks later.

I may submit something on Registry analysis...we'll have to see. This may be a good segue into a book...I've been thinking that based on some new tools I've been working on, as well as data collected since Windows Forensic Analysis was published, I may have enough to put together a book just on Registry analysis.

This year's challenge is similar to 2005's, except that this time the issue is Linux memory analysis.

This year, the conference is in Baltimore ("Bahlmer"), MD, 11-13 Aug 2008.

I noticed from Anton's blog that the DFRWS 2007 papers were posted and available. I agree with Anton, a couple of the presentations are interesting. I was aware of Andreas's work with the Vista Event Log format, and transforming them into plain text...cool stuff.

Rich Murhpey had a paper entitled Automated Windows event log forensics, which I thought was interesting. In his paper, Rich points to "repairing" Event Log files that have been corrupted, using the method made available by Capt. Stephen Bunting. I can't say that I agree fully with this, as the Event Log files can be easily parsed directly from their binary format. Rich provides the beginnings of this in his paper, and more detailed information is available in my book. Rich also goes into extracting event records from unallocated space using Scalpel, but the file header he uses specifically targets the header and not event records in general (again, check out Windows Forensic Analysis for details on this). Extracting event records (and other objects that contain timestamp information, such as Registry keys) from unallocated space, the pagefile, or a RAM dump takes a bit more work, but it's definitely an achievable goal. Knowing the structure of these objects, we can locate the "magic number", perform some checking to ensure that we indeed have found a valid object, and then extract the information. Oh...wait...that's how the brute force EProcess parsing tools work on RAM dumps! ;-)

For those interested in time synchronization, check out A brief study of time...no, Stephen Hawking did not present this year - though, how cool would that be?! Not only is he one of the greatest minds of our time, but he's been portrayed on The Simpsons, and he's appeared in a quite funny excerpt from Star Trek:TNG! A complete set of media appearances can be seen here. For a brainiac, king-of-all-nerds kind of guy, he really rocks!

Going back to Rich's paper, the theme of DFRWS 2007 was "file carving", and the forensic challenge seems to have gone off fairly well. If you're at all interested in some of the cutting edge research in file carving, take a look at the challenge and results.