"Mozart and Other Pirates"
 |
| Christophe Rousset |
The evening began with Professor Sir Robin Jacob explaining that we would be looking at how much copying the law allows and whether there should be a defence of "transformation". He reminded us of the story of the young Mozart writing down the Allegri "Miserere" from memory after the Vatican had foolishly let him in to listen to their closely guarded secret. Looking at other genres, including the famous photograph of Marilyn Monroe transformed by Andy Warhol, he reminded us that all art may involve copying to some degree.
English law has a straightforward approach to infringement - you have to copy the whole of a work or a substantial part of it. There is no infringement if no copying; nor is there infringement if the boundaries of the idea/expression dichotomy are not breached. But Sir Robin reminded us that this is a tricky concept, quoting Judge Learned Hand who said that: "...nobody has ever been able to fix that boundary and nobody ever can."
Giving us some examples of English copyright cases in the musical field, Sir Robin started with the case of Francis Day & Hunter v. Bron [1963] Ch. 587 concerning "In a Little Spanish Town". Despite some evident (to this GuestKat at least) similarities with the alleged infringing song "Why", the court held that there was no evidence of copying, consciously or unconsciously. A more recent example was "Chariots of Fire", which received the Oscar for best musical score. Listening to the music from which this was allegedly copied, from "City of Violets", a Greek soap opera, there were again some obvious similarities. But on the facts of the case infringement was again not found.
Contrasting the UK approach with that in the US, in which juries make the determinations, Sir Robin posed the question how musically knowledgeable should the tribunal be? This led to a discussion (illustrated with musical extracts) of the Marvin Gaye estate's complaint against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams concerning the songs "Got to Give It Up" and "Blurred Lines", in which the jury found infringement. In contrast, in the comparison between "Taurus" by Spirit and Led Zeppelin's "Stairway to Heaven", it was decided there had been no infringement. We also heard about Harrington and Leonard's dispute with Ed Sheehan about similarities between "Amazing" and "Photograph", in which the matter was settled.
His Honour Michael Fysh QC SC then took over in his familiar style, liberally peppered as always with anecdotes, and gave us an introduction to Christophe Rousset. The Maestro then gave us several musical examples from Mozart and his contemporaries, including Martin y Soler, Paisiello, Jommelli, and the infamous but unfairly maligned Salieri. These were enough to convince this GuestKat that young Wolfgang would have been in some trouble if copyright laws had existed in his day and some of his contemporaries had sued.
It was clear that Mozart and his fellow composers were working in very similar genres and there was much cross-fertilisation. Nevertheless, to this GuestKat, the Mozart examples always seemed to be an improvement on the originals (maybe for reasons of subjectivity or familiarity) leading back to the question posed by Sir Robin at the beginning, whether "transformation" should provide some defence.
One trenchant comment from an eminent musical expert in the audience was to the effect that paying homage to other composers was fine, but at least nowadays most would want their "homage" paid in cash! The evening concluded with questions from the audience, a rare mixture of musicians and musicologists as well as lawyers, and this GuestKat then repaired to dinner with some of the participants to continue the discussions.
Those wishing to see and hear more of Maestro Rousset's talents should look for tickets to see Mozart's early opera Mitridate Re di Ponto (composed when he was 14) here.
